*grumble*

Sep. 7th, 2007 09:02 am
ksmith: (aerynpistol)
The root story about the apparent jockeying for position between 2 CNBC financial reporters is balanced enough at first glance--although I wonder if age differences would be noted so obviously if men were involved. But the Huffington Post headline stating that "CNBC Insists There's No Catfighting Between Its Anchors" just irritates the hell out of me, and not just because it's a standard HuffPo crank-the emotion-up-just-a-little-more headline. Yes, it's the term "catfighting," that handy denigrating catch-all that I've seen used to refer to disagreements between females of all ages and professions, no matter the roots of the disagreement. Because it's all about the hissing and scratching, which makes a lot of entertaining noise, but really doesn't mean anything. No genuine positions of strength. No heartfelt principles being argued. No ambition or ego. It's just girlfighting, and isn't it all one step above jello wrestling anyway?

Yes, I did expect more from a blog/website run by a woman. Guess I expected too much from Ms Huffington.

Update: And now the headline, which is buried on the Media page, reads: "CNBC Insists Burnett, Bartiromo Get Along." I have a feeling it was edited for space, not because of any sudden dawning that maybe they'd made a really lousy choice of words.

*grumble*

Sep. 7th, 2007 09:02 am
ksmith: (aerynpistol)
The root story about the apparent jockeying for position between 2 CNBC financial reporters is balanced enough at first glance--although I wonder if age differences would be noted so obviously if men were involved. But the Huffington Post headline stating that "CNBC Insists There's No Catfighting Between Its Anchors" just irritates the hell out of me, and not just because it's a standard HuffPo crank-the emotion-up-just-a-little-more headline. Yes, it's the term "catfighting," that handy denigrating catch-all that I've seen used to refer to disagreements between females of all ages and professions, no matter the roots of the disagreement. Because it's all about the hissing and scratching, which makes a lot of entertaining noise, but really doesn't mean anything. No genuine positions of strength. No heartfelt principles being argued. No ambition or ego. It's just girlfighting, and isn't it all one step above jello wrestling anyway?

Yes, I did expect more from a blog/website run by a woman. Guess I expected too much from Ms Huffington.

Update: And now the headline, which is buried on the Media page, reads: "CNBC Insists Burnett, Bartiromo Get Along." I have a feeling it was edited for space, not because of any sudden dawning that maybe they'd made a really lousy choice of words.
ksmith: (Default)
...with some academic back-and-forth thrown in to boot.

Scientists in Italy believe they have uncovered a murder - 400 years after it is thought to have taken place. Historians have long suspected that Francesco de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany, and his second wife, Bianca Cappello, did not die of malaria but were poisoned - by Francesco's brother, Cardinal Ferdinando de' Medici, who was vying for the dukedom. For four centuries that theory remained just that - a theory.

But following a study into the affair, forensic and toxicology experts at the University of Florence believe they have uncovered clear evidence of murder by poisoning.


I love the Medicis. Full story here.
ksmith: (Default)
...with some academic back-and-forth thrown in to boot.

Scientists in Italy believe they have uncovered a murder - 400 years after it is thought to have taken place. Historians have long suspected that Francesco de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany, and his second wife, Bianca Cappello, did not die of malaria but were poisoned - by Francesco's brother, Cardinal Ferdinando de' Medici, who was vying for the dukedom. For four centuries that theory remained just that - a theory.

But following a study into the affair, forensic and toxicology experts at the University of Florence believe they have uncovered clear evidence of murder by poisoning.


I love the Medicis. Full story here.
ksmith: (brollie)
Light rain this morning, and cloudy. Could have slushy snow toward week's end. Yea!

J5 stuff )

Shameless self-promo )

The rest of the weekend )

Thanksgiving is the weekend after next. Four day weekend! Should get some writing done.
ksmith: (brollie)
Light rain this morning, and cloudy. Could have slushy snow toward week's end. Yea!

J5 stuff )

Shameless self-promo )

The rest of the weekend )

Thanksgiving is the weekend after next. Four day weekend! Should get some writing done.

*whew*

Sep. 12th, 2006 02:30 pm
ksmith: (bouncing ball)
Eric likes Incident. Called it "very nice". It will be appearing in the December issue of Universe, not the October ish as originally thought. Probably a length thing, I'm guessing, though that's speculation on my part.

In a way, this is good. I wondered how I'd juggle those edits with J5, and figured spontaneous combustion a likely outcome.

*whew*

Sep. 12th, 2006 02:30 pm
ksmith: (bouncing ball)
Eric likes Incident. Called it "very nice". It will be appearing in the December issue of Universe, not the October ish as originally thought. Probably a length thing, I'm guessing, though that's speculation on my part.

In a way, this is good. I wondered how I'd juggle those edits with J5, and figured spontaneous combustion a likely outcome.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223242526 27
282930    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 15th, 2026 01:55 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios