Hmmmmm...

Mar. 3rd, 2009 07:35 pm
ksmith: (gaby1)
[personal profile] ksmith
Gaby:




Rough-coated Jack Russell (NOT Gaby, just posted for comparison purposes):

Date: 2009-03-04 04:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] neutronjockey.livejournal.com
Silky Terrier maybe? (http://www.google.com/search?q=silky+terrier&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a)

That would be my guess within the Terrier family...but certainly the wire coat Jack Russel would be a good guess too. I saw an article months ago about DNA testing for dogs. I failed miserably in guessing the breed of the dog based on appearance/conformation vice what the dog's actual genetic markers revealed. O.o I would have never guessed Husky for Gabby.

Date: 2009-03-04 05:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goingferal.livejournal.com
I'm hearing reports that the DNA marker tests are pretty unreliable--for example, people testing a dog of a known breed and getting unlikely results.

But, if you posit that American Eskimo/Husky breeds have likely commonalities (similar progenitors for the breeds), then maybe she's something like an Am Eskimo and a JRT cross?

I find the testing fascinating--I just don't really believe the results all too often.
Edited Date: 2009-03-04 05:47 am (UTC)

Date: 2009-03-04 06:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] neutronjockey.livejournal.com
They are narrowing the haplotype frequencies down more and more, the problem is not having a wide range database with more samples to draw from... it's a young science, give it time. The world is doing fascinating stuff with DNA, mDNA and other types of genetic sequencing.

One of the things I find questionable is some of the 'roots' and ancestral DNA sites which tout being able to definitively report on a person's ancestry---with, as you said, having an accuracy range only and probably not the most accurate sequencing machines available...

Date: 2009-03-04 01:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kristine-smith.livejournal.com
I went with the testing service my vet recommended, Wisdom Panel. They use blood instead of a cheek swab, have a library of 157 breeds, and claim 90% accuracy.

My vet felt the results were correct with regards Gaby. Her behavior--like her talkativeness--pointed to Husky. Gaby's larger than most terriers as well. 15 inches or so at the shoulder, maybe, and close to 35 pounds.

Date: 2009-03-04 01:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kristine-smith.livejournal.com
The Silky is a toy breed, and Gaby isn't all that small. And her coat has a coarseness to it.

I know the best I can hope for is an estimate.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223242526 27
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 17th, 2026 07:02 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios