ksmith: (paperwork)
[personal profile] ksmith
Why is it that those fragments of scenes, those odd mentions and bits of business, are the parts that take the most damned research?

Date: 2008-12-05 07:31 am (UTC)
mithriltabby: (Ceiling Cat)
From: [personal profile] mithriltabby
Anthropic principle, perhaps? (You were already able to assemble the big ones because you’d already done enough research for them that they fit together easily from what you had in working memory.)

Date: 2008-12-05 04:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kristine-smith.livejournal.com
I think it's because the Big Scenes seldom involve descriptions of shirt collars. And jackets.

Date: 2008-12-05 05:22 pm (UTC)
mithriltabby: Warning sign: skull with lab safety glasses (Brainiac)
From: [personal profile] mithriltabby
Yeah, those details can get interesting. My mother’s a member of the Costumer’s Guild, so I can usually pick her brains for details; you might find their bookshelf handy.

Date: 2008-12-05 11:51 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-12-05 03:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lmarley.livejournal.com
Yup. I'm constantly getting hung up on historical underwear.

Date: 2008-12-05 04:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kristine-smith.livejournal.com
"He took off his shirt."

How, exactly? Did he unbutton it? Were there buttons back then? Or did he untie the neck and pull the shirt over his head? Was there a collar? Was it long and pointy or kinda like a ruff. Because at some point, when you least expect it and you don't really have time to look things up, it will matter.

Jiminy Christmas Pete!

Date: 2008-12-05 04:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lmarley.livejournal.com
I love costume museums, for this very reason. Last winter I spent an hour in the basement of the Met in New York, making notes on the quite fabulous exhibit of costumes they had there. Used almost everything, too!

Date: 2008-12-05 04:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kristine-smith.livejournal.com
"The Met" as in the Opera House? I would have taken the time to visit if I had known the had things like that. Although the hours spent the Metropolitan Museum of Art were not wasted. Their clothing display was confined to couture, however, which I would have enjoyed at any other time.

Date: 2008-12-05 05:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lmarley.livejournal.com
I did tour the Met that trip, also for research purposes, but in this case I meant the Metropolitan Museum of Art. It was a display of couture, but there were at least half a dozen historical costumes, and some of them were spectacular. The internet has been very helpful, as well. I had good luck googling things like "18th Century Costumes" and found good sites that are meant for costume designers.

Date: 2008-12-05 05:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kristine-smith.livejournal.com
Were the costumes early 1800s? If they weren't, I would have blown them off. Not the period I was interested in.

If I did miss them, then it wasn't for want of hunting. I asked the guides, and tramped all over that damned place. My feet ached.

Date: 2008-12-05 04:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jemck.livejournal.com
May I recommend Fashion in Costume 1200-2000 by Joan Nunn.
(Amazon UK (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Fashion-Costume-1200-2000-Joan-Nunn/dp/156663279X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1228494142&sr=8-1))
(Amazon US (http://www.amazon.com/Fashion-Costume-1200-2000-Revised-Joan/dp/156663279X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1228494245&sr=8-1)

My copy is one of those entirely serendipitous 'ooh, that looks like it could be useful' authorial book purchases, that I have since found invaluable.

Date: 2008-12-05 04:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kristine-smith.livejournal.com
Oh..a reference book...

Thank you!

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223242526 27
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 9th, 2026 07:54 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios