Rumors

[ksmith]

That Palin will step aside, or that McCain will dump her.

Thing is, he could then pick someone like Romney or Ridge or Lieberman. He's already seen that shoring up the base alone likely won't get him where he needs to be. So why not throw another Hail Mary and trade Palin for someone who would appeal to the moderates, indies, some conservative Dems, and the portion of the base that would rather be found dead in a ditch than vote Dem and that don't want to sit out the election.

He would lose the hardcore values conservatives for whom choice is a make or break issue. But they wouldn't vote for Obama either. Would Barr then be their man, and could he take enough votes away from McCain to assure an Obama victory?

I have no flippin' clue.

Comments

[sazettel.livejournal.com]

Not meaning to doubt, but..where on earth did you hear that one?

[kristine-smith.livejournal.com]

I saw it on a sidebar at Talking Points Memo. The original story was in the Times of London. Vicious quote from David Letterman, who is apparently going to swing for the fences against McCain for the rest of the campaign:

David Letterman, the late-night television chat show host, joked that Palin’s meetings with world leaders at the United Nations in New York looked like “take your daughter to work day”.

TPM is taking it with a grain of salt. I wouldn't put it past the McCain campaign to float it out there to see how it plays--it falls in with their Hail Mary campaign strategy.

But any voter who would be reeled in because of a wedding should be examined for brain damage.

[sazettel.livejournal.com]

Well, Gov. Palin has become a kind of cult celebrity among a certain segment of the population, and that she and her husband and their handlers are going to force their underage pregnant daughter into marriage is seen as an incredibly life-affirming act, so what could be better than having a celebrity wedding to send the base into further ecstasies.

[coalboy.livejournal.com]

Unfortunately, that wouldn't stop them from voting.

[kateelliott.livejournal.com]

I believe this was reported in The Times (London), but you are right I should have said it is a rumor. I do find it unbelievable and yet, after everything I've seen in this campaign, who knows?