Thursday

Apr. 19th, 2007 05:59 pm
ksmith: (Default)
[personal profile] ksmith
Tomorrow I take Mickey to the big vet clinic for his ultrasound. He's to have no food after midnight, which I would guess means they're going to put him under?

Poor little guy. He's trying to sleep now, but I think I have Peter Murphy playing too loudly. Bad Dogmom me.

Thinking about things. After the TWA 800 disaster, one of the local shock jock radio stations received lots of calls from the usual gang of chest-thumping pencil-dicks, describing how they would have freed themselves from their seats after the explosion, found whatever life rafts or other flotation devices they could, and survived the crash into the ocean. No, the situation can't really compare with what happened at VT. Simple physics would've removed all judgment from the TWA 800 equation. The reality of what happens to a human body that is held immobile in a metal tube while shockwaves rocket through soft tissue.

Now others of that same ilk are going on about what they perceive as the cowardly inaction of the men of VT. God, are we ever going to get past this wanking bluster bullshit? Are the realists going to retake the hill anytime soon?

Really good comment by Old Jarhead, #84 in today's [livejournal.com profile] makinglight thread. The rest of the post is quite good, as well.

I took a private investigations course in 1996. The instructor told us that he had carried a licensed firearm for years, and had only taken it out of his holster once. He didn't fire it at that time. I think he and Old Jarhead would have gotten along.

Date: 2007-04-20 01:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kristine-smith.livejournal.com
Speaking from what I've gleaned in discussions with others, and reading--please, someone with more experience, feel free to wade in--there's a prime distance--6-8 feet?--where even an inexperienced shooter can do a lot of damage. Also, we don't know what folks were doing as he shot--even a few seconds of shocked stillness could allow for several fatalities. How big were these classrooms, and how many people were in them? Crowding? Running into each other and tripping over desks in panic? He's in front of the door--they can't run past him. We could be talking fish in a barrel.

He could have been using juiced ammo. You're right, a lot of questions. No one mentioned how much, if any, practice on the range he did.

Date: 2007-04-20 04:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pmrabble.livejournal.com
Coverage tonight showed he had OMG number of rounds of hollow point. This was serious premeditation.....

Date: 2007-04-20 02:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thecurlyboy.livejournal.com
Based on personal experience, I'd say your 6-8 feet against moving targets is in the right range. At those ranges, given typical muzzle velocities and someone running full speed perpendicular to your line of fire, you're only going to be off 1.5-2 inches from whatever you were pointed at when the bullet was fired. Assuming you are inexperienced and have your gun pointed at the middle of your target's torso, and using an average-thickness torso, you're still going to get a solid hit and do significant damage at that range.

I could probably do some more math, throw some statistical magic together and put together a paper on it taking into account a lot more, but ...

Or not. Now that I'm looking at it, that's creepy. Sorry.

Date: 2007-04-20 07:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kristine-smith.livejournal.com
Not really. I think about things like this sometimes.

A Writer Who Shall Remain Nameless told a story about how she and a friend worked out how to poison vast amounts of food in a grocery store.

It's parasitic, in a way. But it's what we do.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223242526 27
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 18th, 2026 07:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios