Too many b/o/o/k/s/ movies
An interesting article, swiped from
dtaylor, lamenting the fact that good small movies can get buried in the avalanche of new releases for any given week. If something doesn't fill seats right away, exhibitors get rid of it and bring in something that will fill seats, like, frex, the latest b/e/s/t/s/e/l/l/e/r blockbuster.
http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,1769354,00.html
It caught my attention because it seems analogous to the argument that good books are being overlooked/overwhelmed in part because there are too many books being published.
http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,1769354,00.html
It caught my attention because it seems analogous to the argument that good books are being overlooked/overwhelmed in part because there are too many books being published.
Apples and oranges
JD
Re: Apples and oranges
I was also comparing the one week movie tryout to reduced time an average new author is allowed to build an audience. One week for a movie, 2 or 3 books for an author, then out. I was thinking of the overall reduction in the time allowed for a new work to build an audience, and the emphasis on blockbusters.