O...kay...
Jul. 1st, 2008 06:58 amNot sure how I feel about this:
JIM CAVIEZEL AND IAN MCKELLEN TO STAR IN AMC'S REINTERPRETATION OF CULT CLASSIC, THE PRISONER
Six-Part Mini-Series Set to Premiere in 2009
New Series Furthers AMC's Cinematic Approach to Creating High-Quality Original Programming
Someone should tell their publicity department that "original" kinda means that NO ONE HAS DONE IT BEFORE. Remakes aren't original programming.
I'm on board with Ian McKellen. I'd pay to watch Ian McKellen read the labels of soup cans. Does anyone know enough about Cavaziel to give an opinion?
While the original series, which debuted in 1967, was a riff on Cold War politics, AMC's reinterpretation will reflect 21st Century concerns and anxieties, such as liberty, security, and surveillance, yet also showcase the same key elements of paranoia, tense action and socio-political commentary seen in McGoohan's enigmatic original.
Now we can talk about TP:TOS.
So, kinda reserving opinion, although my first reaction is to jump up and down and yell NO! NO! Then hold my breath until I turn blue. Or something.
Because we all know how well that movie remake of THE AVENGERS went over.
JIM CAVIEZEL AND IAN MCKELLEN TO STAR IN AMC'S REINTERPRETATION OF CULT CLASSIC, THE PRISONER
Six-Part Mini-Series Set to Premiere in 2009
New Series Furthers AMC's Cinematic Approach to Creating High-Quality Original Programming
Someone should tell their publicity department that "original" kinda means that NO ONE HAS DONE IT BEFORE. Remakes aren't original programming.
I'm on board with Ian McKellen. I'd pay to watch Ian McKellen read the labels of soup cans. Does anyone know enough about Cavaziel to give an opinion?
While the original series, which debuted in 1967, was a riff on Cold War politics, AMC's reinterpretation will reflect 21st Century concerns and anxieties, such as liberty, security, and surveillance, yet also showcase the same key elements of paranoia, tense action and socio-political commentary seen in McGoohan's enigmatic original.
Now we can talk about TP:TOS.
So, kinda reserving opinion, although my first reaction is to jump up and down and yell NO! NO! Then hold my breath until I turn blue. Or something.
Because we all know how well that movie remake of THE AVENGERS went over.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 12:24 pm (UTC)Part of me is appalled by the idea of remaking "The Prisoner." Part of me is intrigued. I guess we have no choice; it'll come whether or we want it or not.
Hmmmm.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 12:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 03:04 pm (UTC)dn
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 04:19 pm (UTC)On the plus side, this means that Mel Gibson isn't making his planned film version of The Prisoner.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 10:09 pm (UTC)OK, speculating a bit. And given that McKellen is in it, I have some small shred of hope.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 10:12 pm (UTC)Good to hear that Caviezel can.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 10:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 10:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 12:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 12:47 am (UTC)Caviezil is pretty good. I've liked him in what I've seen him in, and he's demonstrated pretty good range in his roles (and within them).
no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 12:53 am (UTC)But I could be wrong. I just learned there was a whole rationale for the spin at the end of Spin that left my head as soon as it entered it, it seems, so I could just be not remembering.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 01:01 am (UTC)I think you're right.
I need to get hold of the DVDs. PBS.org is offering the whole set.